Skip to main content
39 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 5, 2018 at 5:05 answer added user184411 timeline score: 0
Sep 19, 2017 at 13:02 answer added Beth timeline score: 0
Sep 12, 2017 at 2:16 comment added Kris Ironing the shoelaces is a good one the picture it brings to mind of a fussy butler being overly concerned with minute detail makes me smile
Sep 5, 2017 at 18:17 comment added GEdgar "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." --Shakespeare, Hamlet
Sep 5, 2017 at 18:13 answer added David W timeline score: 3
Sep 5, 2017 at 17:00 comment added John Bode This from a coworker, after he realized he'd just spent 10 minutes explaining something to me in way too much detail - "You asked for a pencil, I told you how to build a typewriter."
Sep 5, 2017 at 12:34 answer added AJFaraday timeline score: 4
Sep 4, 2017 at 22:05 history protected ab2
Sep 4, 2017 at 21:57 answer added Bill Porter timeline score: 0
Sep 4, 2017 at 16:57 answer added VividD timeline score: 3
Sep 4, 2017 at 16:41 answer added Geeb timeline score: 2
Sep 4, 2017 at 10:53 answer added ShopTech timeline score: 1
Sep 4, 2017 at 10:31 comment added camden_kid I'd suggest "Overkill".
Sep 4, 2017 at 6:18 comment added user71581 "Getting granular" - I can't stand the phrase but many people I work with can't get enough of it.
Sep 4, 2017 at 0:51 answer added samgak timeline score: 40
Sep 3, 2017 at 20:06 answer added fralau timeline score: 1
Sep 3, 2017 at 18:01 history edited 1006a CC BY-SA 3.0
Added additional information from OP's comment, with light edits
Sep 3, 2017 at 17:50 answer added Birkensox timeline score: 0
Sep 3, 2017 at 15:59 answer added filistinist timeline score: 0
Sep 3, 2017 at 8:18 answer added Jamie Hanrahan timeline score: 9
Sep 3, 2017 at 7:09 answer added Debbie Wilson timeline score: 13
Sep 3, 2017 at 5:00 comment added Sven Yargs I would use the phrase "explaining [something] atom by atom"—but as far as I know, it isn't an idiom.
S Sep 3, 2017 at 2:44 history suggested Daniel Austin CC BY-SA 3.0
Spelling of context
Sep 3, 2017 at 2:23 comment added Daniel Austin In some situations, it might be appropriate to use the expression going all round the houses. An explanation that goes all round the houses, is one that includes a lot of unnecessary detail and fails to get to the point quickly.
Sep 3, 2017 at 2:14 review Suggested edits
S Sep 3, 2017 at 2:44
Sep 2, 2017 at 22:44 comment added Angmar I was looking for a phrase of some sort, somewhat pejorative but funny one - idiom, colloquialism or something multi-word. In my language we have a saying that someone explaines something and "includes the root" or "explain every pond and pool", e.g. when someone asks the shortest way from a point A to a point B, and instead of telling which one it is, you start describing every rock and tree and bush on the way, which really is not at all informative. Pretty much an exact opposite to "cutting to the chase".
Sep 2, 2017 at 22:36 answer added htmlcoderexe timeline score: 17
Sep 2, 2017 at 22:09 history tweeted twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/904103922146705409
Sep 2, 2017 at 21:41 answer added Weather Vane timeline score: 27
Sep 2, 2017 at 21:19 comment added Roddy of the Frozen Peas "TMI"... But that's more of a modern colloquialism that an idiom.
Sep 2, 2017 at 20:19 comment added marcellothearcane Like 'nitpicking' or 'splitting hairs'? Not exclusively related to explaining things though. They might be 'flogging a dead horse' too...
Sep 2, 2017 at 20:04 history edited Edwin Ashworth CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Sep 2, 2017 at 20:02 vote accept Angmar
Sep 2, 2017 at 19:58 comment added Anonym Such an explanation is long-winded and the speaker a windbag.
Sep 2, 2017 at 19:40 comment added NVZ If, in case, you were looking for single words: Word to describe “when someone describes something in too much detail”
Sep 2, 2017 at 19:40 answer added StoneyB on hiatus timeline score: 29
Sep 2, 2017 at 19:26 answer added Dr Xorile timeline score: -6
Sep 2, 2017 at 19:06 review First posts
Sep 2, 2017 at 20:04
Sep 2, 2017 at 19:05 history asked Angmar CC BY-SA 3.0