Timeline for Comma separation dilemma
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2017 at 21:21 | answer | added | Lance Baker | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 23:13 | comment | added | Hot Licks | My first instinct is to break the two unrelated pieces into separate sentences. They don't belong together. | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 23:05 | answer | added | mile42 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 7:29 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/839739841562742785 | ||
| Mar 9, 2017 at 4:53 | answer | added | Charles McCoy | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 4:41 | answer | added | aparente001 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 8, 2017 at 19:55 | history | edited | Jacinto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor corrections
|
| Mar 8, 2017 at 19:15 | comment | added | Yosef Baskin | Don't look at the comma-and-comma as a set, which it is not. The set would be comma-traditionally-comma for the single word traditionally, as an aside like this, to set up the whole ensuing clause as being traditional. Placed right after have, it needs no commas. | |
| Mar 8, 2017 at 18:31 | history | edited | Dan Bron | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2017 at 18:23 | history | asked | PurplePenguin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |