Skip to main content
spelling corrections
Source Link
Dan Bron
  • 28.5k
  • 17
  • 102
  • 140

I have a phrase that reads:

Section 8.01, entitled "Polar Bonding in Basic Organic Compounds," provides, in pertinent part, that due to the slight electro-negative bias of Fluorinefluorine, the Carboncarbon-Fluorinefluorine bond has an electronegativity that slightly favors the Fluorine pole.

The first part of the sentence is what I'm concerned with. Should I remove the commas separating "in pertinent part"? What's the grammatical justification?

I have a phrase that reads:

Section 8.01, entitled "Polar Bonding in Basic Organic Compounds," provides, in pertinent part, that due to the slight electro-negative bias of Fluorine, the Carbon-Fluorine bond has an electronegativity that slightly favors the Fluorine pole.

The first part of the sentence is what I'm concerned with. Should I remove the commas separating "in pertinent part"? What's the grammatical justification?

I have a phrase that reads:

Section 8.01, entitled "Polar Bonding in Basic Organic Compounds," provides, in pertinent part, that due to the slight electro-negative bias of fluorine, the carbon-fluorine bond has an electronegativity that slightly favors the Fluorine pole.

The first part of the sentence is what I'm concerned with. Should I remove the commas separating "in pertinent part"? What's the grammatical justification?

I have a phrase that reads:

Section 8.01, entitled "Polar Bonding in Basic Organic Compounds," provides, in pertinent part, that due to the slight electro-negative bias of FlourineFluorine, the carbonCarbon-flourineFluorine bond has an electronegativity that slightly favors the FlourineFluorine pole.

The first part of the sentence is what I'm concerned with. Should I remove the commas separating "in pertinent part"? What's the grammatical justification?

I have a phrase that reads:

Section 8.01, entitled "Polar Bonding in Basic Organic Compounds," provides, in pertinent part, that due to the slight electro-negative bias of Flourine, the carbon-flourine bond has an electronegativity that slightly favors the Flourine pole.

The first part of the sentence is what I'm concerned with. Should I remove the commas separating "in pertinent part"? What's the grammatical justification?

I have a phrase that reads:

Section 8.01, entitled "Polar Bonding in Basic Organic Compounds," provides, in pertinent part, that due to the slight electro-negative bias of Fluorine, the Carbon-Fluorine bond has an electronegativity that slightly favors the Fluorine pole.

The first part of the sentence is what I'm concerned with. Should I remove the commas separating "in pertinent part"? What's the grammatical justification?

Source Link
franklin
  • 327
  • 1
  • 4
  • 15

Is comma usage in this phrase correct?

I have a phrase that reads:

Section 8.01, entitled "Polar Bonding in Basic Organic Compounds," provides, in pertinent part, that due to the slight electro-negative bias of Flourine, the carbon-flourine bond has an electronegativity that slightly favors the Flourine pole.

The first part of the sentence is what I'm concerned with. Should I remove the commas separating "in pertinent part"? What's the grammatical justification?