Skip to main content
3 of 3
added 3 characters in body
LPH
  • 23.9k
  • 3
  • 23
  • 50
  1. Yes, those clauses are relative clauses, without doubt.

  2. No, it is not possible to change "which" to "that", the reason being that this relative clause being a non-defining relative clause it can't retain its non-defining property if "that" is used. Let's recall that the comma is the mark of a non-defining clause, otherwise called a non-determining clause or non-restrictive clause. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammar/clauses

  3. No, the clause in which "which makes" is replaced by "making" is not a relative clause. It is a nonfinite clause without subject. However, the nonfinite verb form ("making") is a formal indicator of subordination, just as the relative pronoun (in this case, "which") is such a formal indicator. The comma is not a part of the clause: it is a sentence element with the purpose of articulating the sentence. It can be considered as a marker of syntax, this being so because the syntax is different when it is absent.

LPH
  • 23.9k
  • 3
  • 23
  • 50