Timeline for Can we use this expression "be blamed"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 31, 2012 at 18:20 | answer | added | FumbleFingers | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 31, 2012 at 12:03 | vote | accept | Listenever | ||
Dec 31, 2012 at 12:03 | vote | accept | Listenever | ||
Dec 31, 2012 at 12:03 | |||||
Dec 31, 2012 at 11:28 | answer | added | Tim Lymington | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 31, 2012 at 9:02 | vote | accept | Listenever | ||
Dec 31, 2012 at 12:03 | |||||
Dec 31, 2012 at 7:14 | answer | added | Kris | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:59 | comment | added | Jim | Along with the two sentences I offered above there is also: Officials believe that more than one person may be to blame for the fire. Those are the only permutations I can think of that leave you basic sentence structure intact. | |
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:57 | comment | added | Jim | Unfortunately that sentence is ungrammatical. | |
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:53 | comment | added | Listenever | @Jim: Yes: Officials believe that more than one person may be "to" be blamed for the fire. | |
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:52 | comment | added | Jim | I'm not sure I understand where you want to add to. Do you mean Officials believe that more than one person is to be blamed for the fire? | |
S Dec 31, 2012 at 6:49 | history | edited | avpaderno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 90 characters in body; edited title
|
S Dec 31, 2012 at 6:49 | history | suggested | Mohit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed language
|
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:48 | comment | added | Listenever | @Jim: When we add ‘to’ on your sentence, can it have the meaning of obligation, while yours has no meaning of it? | |
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:43 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:49 | |||||
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:40 | comment | added | Jim | No, but you can say, Officials believe that more than one person may be blamed for the fire. | |
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:39 | history | asked | Listenever | CC BY-SA 3.0 |