Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 31, 2012 at 18:20 answer added FumbleFingers timeline score: 2
Dec 31, 2012 at 12:03 vote accept Listenever
Dec 31, 2012 at 12:03 vote accept Listenever
Dec 31, 2012 at 12:03
Dec 31, 2012 at 11:28 answer added Tim Lymington timeline score: 1
Dec 31, 2012 at 9:02 vote accept Listenever
Dec 31, 2012 at 12:03
Dec 31, 2012 at 7:14 answer added Kris timeline score: 2
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:59 comment added Jim Along with the two sentences I offered above there is also: Officials believe that more than one person may be to blame for the fire. Those are the only permutations I can think of that leave you basic sentence structure intact.
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:57 comment added Jim Unfortunately that sentence is ungrammatical.
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:53 comment added Listenever @Jim: Yes: Officials believe that more than one person may be "to" be blamed for the fire.
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:52 comment added Jim I'm not sure I understand where you want to add to. Do you mean Officials believe that more than one person is to be blamed for the fire?
S Dec 31, 2012 at 6:49 history edited avpaderno CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 90 characters in body; edited title
S Dec 31, 2012 at 6:49 history suggested Mohit CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed language
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:48 comment added Listenever @Jim: When we add ‘to’ on your sentence, can it have the meaning of obligation, while yours has no meaning of it?
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:43 review Suggested edits
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:49
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:40 comment added Jim No, but you can say, Officials believe that more than one person may be blamed for the fire.
Dec 31, 2012 at 6:39 history asked Listenever CC BY-SA 3.0