Timeline for Usage of "matter" and "substance"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2012 at 0:38 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | I keep forgetting that! You're quite right - even if we end up knowing exactly what the OP is after, people in future might come to the question looking for a somewhat different tak on things (perhaps we should tack "and pus" on the end of the question! :) | |
| Nov 23, 2012 at 22:20 | comment | added | Andrew Leach♦ | Comments are ephemeral, though, and this is an answer to the question in the title. Someone might want just this answer. | |
| Nov 23, 2012 at 22:18 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | I agree it's worth including - but as you say, it's probably not immediately relevant to the question. So I think maybe it would have been better as a comment (assuming you could squeeze the substance into 600 chars). | |
| Nov 23, 2012 at 22:12 | history | answered | Andrew Leach♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |