Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 3 at 20:16 comment added Anton Sherwood I have yet to meet another native speaker who shares my distaste for on-the-job training, in-depth reporting, at-will employment and so on, versus training on the job. I believe the phrase the full-faith-and-credit clause has appeared in decisions of the US Supreme Court.
Sep 13, 2023 at 16:30 comment added Mitch @YoichiOishi My assessment is that this hyphenation practice is not standard at all, is very very informal, would be given a very poor grade in an assignment, but is still used by people. I don't think it is new, but it may be new that it is appearing more often in print.
Oct 3, 2012 at 7:26 comment added Yoichi Oishi By high number of views and up-votes which I did not expect, I came to think a lengthy string of hyphenated-words as in the quoted case is not very usual or neat way of writing, and I don’t need to emulate it in my writing. If Q-R-X-Y-Z-noun style notation is granted for the currency or ubiquity, users of this site wouldn’t much care this question.
Oct 3, 2012 at 5:13 history edited MetaEd CC BY-SA 3.0
spelling
Oct 2, 2012 at 19:53 vote accept Yoichi Oishi
Oct 1, 2012 at 12:59 comment added Mitch @Jim: yes, I agree that my rewording is not the best, but it is an attempt at getting both a 'standard' expression and one that captures as much as possible the exact meaning of the article's expression.
Oct 1, 2012 at 12:55 comment added Mitch @RussellMcMahon: I think you have overspecialized the explanation of this particular usage. Yes, it is often used for scare quotes, as it is in this instance (and sarcasm is often a trope used in these op-ed columns), but the hyphenated sequence is also often used in other circumstances, mostly for stylistic variation and can signal informality or stream-of-consciousness writing.
Oct 1, 2012 at 4:39 comment added Russell McMahon Mitch - I'd like to politely suggest that you have missed the point of tjhe construct used. It is a very purposeful construction not meant to get around lack of adjectives or to create a new one - it's main aim is to say that the description draws a long bow / isn't really true / beggars credibility / is a misuse of stats / is known by all to be essentially false.
Oct 1, 2012 at 2:45 comment added Jim I think the "not technically in a recession" in your "standard and straightforward" rewrite gets a bit lost. I might say, "...2012 might turn out to be the worst year in modern American history of those not technically in a recession."
Oct 1, 2012 at 1:41 history edited Mitch CC BY-SA 3.0
extra
Oct 1, 2012 at 1:32 history answered Mitch CC BY-SA 3.0