Timeline for "A smile cures the wounding of a frown"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2012 at 19:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackEnglish/status/226762208183451649 | ||
| Jul 21, 2012 at 17:45 | history | edited | RegDwigнt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 217 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Jul 21, 2012 at 16:47 | answer | added | Cool Elf | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 16:46 | answer | added | bib | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 15:23 | comment | added | karthik | @cornbreadninja of course not. :) | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 15:19 | comment | added | cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 | @karthik you are quite welcome! I meant no offense and I hope I didn't alter your meaning. :) | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 15:14 | comment | added | karthik | @PeterShor but when you say wounds of war, you do mean wounds caused by the war, isnt it? Please correct me if I am wrong. | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 15:03 | comment | added | karthik | yes, i agree. the frown definitely isnt the wound. | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 14:55 | comment | added | Peter Shor | It should definitely be the wounding of a frown, because the frown itself isn't the wound, the frown wounds other people (the ones being frowned at), and the smile heals that. If you say "A smile heals the wound of a frown", you're saying the frown itself is the wound. But you are right in that diseases are generally cured and wounds healed. | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 14:55 | answer | added | user22244 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 14:41 | history | edited | cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved readability, corrected spelling, added 'gerund' tag
|
| Jul 21, 2012 at 14:32 | history | asked | karthik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |