Skip to main content
added 74 characters in body
Source Link
user21701
user21701

What makes you think that "catastrophicness" isn't grammatical? It may not"Catastrophicity" might be commonly used, and it may not have the tone you're after, but it's a perfectly valid word. You take the adjective "catastrophic" and tack on the suffix "ness"closer to make it a noun. I like the word. If the tone fits, you could just go ahead and use itbeing conventional.

What makes you think that "catastrophicness" isn't grammatical? It may not be commonly used, and it may not have the tone you're after, but it's a perfectly valid word. You take the adjective "catastrophic" and tack on the suffix "ness" to make it a noun. I like the word. If the tone fits, you could just go ahead and use it.

"Catastrophicity" might be closer to being conventional.

Source Link
user21701
user21701

What makes you think that "catastrophicness" isn't grammatical? It may not be commonly used, and it may not have the tone you're after, but it's a perfectly valid word. You take the adjective "catastrophic" and tack on the suffix "ness" to make it a noun. I like the word. If the tone fits, you could just go ahead and use it.