Timeline for "Compared to" vs "as compared to"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2015 at 2:24 | history | protected | tchrist♦ | ||
| Jun 7, 2014 at 13:54 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: -2 | |
| Dec 30, 2013 at 15:54 | comment | added | user60898 | why do we use the past tense of compare on these examples? not 'compare to, or 'as compare to'? What does the rule apply? Thanks for your help. | |
| Jul 17, 2012 at 18:54 | vote | accept | imsc | ||
| Jul 17, 2012 at 15:24 | history | edited | Daniel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 17, 2012 at 15:21 | answer | added | Daniel | timeline score: 23 | |
| Jul 17, 2012 at 15:19 | comment | added | user19148 | Probably, "are both ..." | |
| Jul 17, 2012 at 15:18 | history | asked | imsc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |