Timeline for Why does legal English sometimes repeat the antecedent noun after "which"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2012 at 19:34 | comment | added | Barrie England | @talkaboutquality: Lawyers don't like to leave anything open to doubt - other than when it suits them to do so. The repetition of 'folder' removes any possibility that 'which' could refer to anything else. But perhaps you should ask a lawyer. | |
| Jul 12, 2012 at 19:24 | comment | added | talkaboutquality | Thanks @BarrieEngland, but your comments and answers have helped me adjust my question. See updated question -- no longer about grammatical description, but about what the legal writer thinks s/he's adding. | |
| Jul 12, 2012 at 19:21 | history | edited | Barrie England | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 550 characters in body
|
| Jul 12, 2012 at 19:00 | history | undeleted | Barrie England | ||
| Jul 12, 2012 at 18:58 | history | edited | Barrie England | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 45 characters in body
|
| Jul 12, 2012 at 18:55 | history | deleted | Barrie England | ||
| Jul 12, 2012 at 18:53 | history | answered | Barrie England | CC BY-SA 3.0 |