Timeline for How to make a statement and then iterate through a list thereafter
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 11, 2012 at 10:04 | history | edited | Noah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited.
|
| Jul 11, 2012 at 5:02 | comment | added | nagytech | @Fr0zenFyr I saw that, was just agreeing with you and confirming the fact. :) | |
| Jul 11, 2012 at 2:48 | comment | added | Fr0zenFyr | @Geoist: I said that choice (3) is not a good fit, see above. Something like "the only entrances to the construction site are towards the east and towards the west" should be sufficient. | |
| Jul 11, 2012 at 0:33 | vote | accept | nagytech | ||
| Jul 11, 2012 at 0:15 | comment | added | nagytech | @Fr0zenFyr (3) is definitely not going to help. It leaves an open end as to wether or not there are more entrances. I need to explicitly state that there were only two entrances. Thanks! | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 19:22 | comment | added | Fr0zenFyr | I frame the sentences in these ways in writing: (1)The construction site has two entrances, one to the east and the other to the west. (2)The construction site has three entrances: first/one to the east, second to the west and third to the south. (3)The construction site has an entrance each to the east, the west, the south and the north. (Not really a good choice though) (4)The construction site has two entrances, both to the east. (5)The construction site has three entrances, one towards east and the other two towards west. | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 19:13 | answer | added | James Waldby - jwpat7 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:55 | vote | accept | nagytech | ||
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:55 | |||||
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:50 | vote | accept | nagytech | ||
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:55 | |||||
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:47 | comment | added | cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 | Forget I said that. @Em1 is right because one to the east and one to the west doesn't stand as an independent clause. | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:42 | comment | added | nagytech | @cornbreadninja Thanks! Does your answer still apply given that the items I am appending aren't really in 'support' of my original statement? | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:41 | answer | added | Em1 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:38 | comment | added | cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 | See this similar question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/73896/… | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:37 | comment | added | Em1 | Your link does also say "don't use it with conjunctions". You're using "and", so the semicolon is wrong according to your link (als also according to my sense of languages, but that's another thing) | |
| Jul 10, 2012 at 14:12 | history | edited | nagytech | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 317 characters in body
|
| Jul 10, 2012 at 12:41 | history | asked | nagytech | CC BY-SA 3.0 |