Timeline for Combined reference to multiple leave
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 4, 2012 at 16:03 | vote | accept | Fr0zenFyr | ||
| Jul 2, 2012 at 6:46 | comment | added | Fr0zenFyr | @Carlo_R.: :D Lucky to have a boss like him. :P | |
| Jul 2, 2012 at 6:21 | comment | added | Fr0zenFyr | @David: Thanks for the response. Is there any reference where it says "leaves" is incorrect? I'm sure the punctuation and grammar are terrible in the approval. | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 22:33 | comment | added | user16269 | Your understanding is correct. The reply has used the word "leave" incorrectly. It's also poorly punctuated. I would have written this. "Approved; the leave you requested is granted." | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 21:42 | answer | added | Andrew Leach♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 20:46 | comment | added | user19148 | However your boss is a good person in comparison with mine, who doesn't grant me leave as he should do. +1 to the interesting question. | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 20:41 | answer | added | user2683 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 20:37 | comment | added | Fr0zenFyr | Now another question popped up in my head- why is it "Leave(s) of absence" when leave means absence in itself? | |
| Jun 29, 2012 at 20:32 | history | edited | Fr0zenFyr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added references that caused the confusion
|
| Jun 29, 2012 at 20:25 | history | asked | Fr0zenFyr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |