Timeline for Difference between "in to" and "into" [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
|
|
May 22, 2012 at 17:51 | history | edited | user2683 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body; edited title
|
May 22, 2012 at 17:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
insert duplicate link
|
|
May 22, 2012 at 17:37 | history | closed |
JSBձոգչ Mitch RegDwigнt |
exact duplicate | |
May 22, 2012 at 17:35 | answer | added | Neil Coffey | timeline score: 3 | |
May 22, 2012 at 17:28 | comment | added | Andrew Christianson | Just for the sake of clarity, in this particular case, into would be the correct choice. As for pronunciation...in my experience (American English), one would say into at a faster clip relative to in to. Otherwise, there's no difference. | |
May 22, 2012 at 17:03 | comment | added | Christi | You can find the answer to this question at english.stackexchange.com/questions/125/… | |
May 22, 2012 at 16:46 | history | asked | Alberto S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |