Timeline for Close to home = quite accurate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2017 at 21:58 | answer | added | user252838 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 15, 2012 at 6:09 | vote | accept | Nicolas Raoul | ||
| Apr 14, 2012 at 15:01 | answer | added | MrHen | timeline score: 9 | |
| Apr 14, 2012 at 13:19 | answer | added | mrwes | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 14, 2012 at 10:35 | history | edited | RegDwigнt |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 14, 2012 at 10:34 | comment | added | Peter Shor | The definitions aren't wrong, and you're not misunderstanding them. I can't decide whether Wikipedia is misusing the term, because these portrayals can be viewed as an insult, and "hits close to home" applied to insults has a meaning that isn't quite in these definitions. Google "joke hits close to home". | |
| Apr 14, 2012 at 10:17 | history | asked | Nicolas Raoul | CC BY-SA 3.0 |