Timeline for What are the historical reasons for the conventional sequence of footnote symbols?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| S Sep 15, 2019 at 21:18 | history | edited | marcellothearcane | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix typo
|
| S Sep 15, 2019 at 21:18 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix typo, double right arrow
|
| Sep 15, 2019 at 18:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 15, 2019 at 21:18 | |||||
| Jul 12, 2013 at 14:31 | history | edited | James Waldby - jwpat7 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix 1 spelling
|
| Apr 27, 2012 at 14:54 | history | edited | Hugo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added an example with parallels and pilcrow
|
| Mar 29, 2012 at 9:39 | comment | added | Kris | Great answer. Members of WritersSE should also benefit from this. | |
| Mar 29, 2012 at 9:19 | history | edited | Hugo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2815 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2012 at 22:10 | comment | added | user19148 | Ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |
| Mar 28, 2012 at 22:07 | comment | added | Hugo | This says the dagger is "not used as a footnote mark next to the name of a living person". It also says another name for dagger is obelisk. So: asterisk and obelisk => Asterix and Obelix! | |
| Mar 28, 2012 at 21:47 | comment | added | user19148 | Awesome! I think it is very intersting the use of asterisk and dagger in genealogy and life sciences. I do not never notice this use. | |
| Mar 28, 2012 at 21:41 | history | edited | Peter Taylor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Oops, there was still some unwanted markup
|
| Mar 28, 2012 at 21:36 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=19148 by developer User.Id=6437 | |
| Mar 28, 2012 at 21:28 | history | answered | Hugo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |