Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 15 at 4:14 comment added Rosie F The structure has a solution which is elegant and idiomatic: "by us". The "who" is correctly "who" because it is the subject of "hate". That is sufficient justification for "who"; no more is needed. In particular, the word "who" doesn't entail changing the "us" to "we". This answer shows an analogous construction.
May 14 at 15:14 comment added Edwin Ashworth @Lambie The original might (admittedly clumsily) equate 'we/us' and the haters, whereas 'those of us who hate him' is partitive. Then only the rewrite I give last (of those offered so far) is accurate.
May 14 at 14:32 history edited Laurel CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
May 14 at 14:17 history duplicates list edited tchrist duplicates list edited from What case follows 'of' in this phrase - nominative or accusative? (the [ways] of HIM who is without end / the [ways] of HE who is without end), personal pronouns in object position but subjective case [duplicate] to What rules make “Remember me, who am your friend” grammatical?, Which is grammatically correct: "Let he who..." or "Let him who...", It is I who am at fault? [duplicate], What case follows 'of' in this phrase - nominative or accusative? (the [ways] of HIM who is without end / the [ways] of HE who is without end), personal pronouns in object position but subjective case [duplicate]
May 14 at 14:15 history closed Edwin Ashworth
tchrist word-choice
Duplicate of What case follows 'of' in this phrase - nominative or accusative? (the [ways] of HIM who is without end / the [ways] of HE who is without end), personal pronouns in object position but subjective case [duplicate]
May 14 at 14:13 history edited tchrist
edited tags
May 14 at 14:05 comment added Edwin Ashworth Both the objective (after the preposition) and the subjective (for we who hate him) are required. A solution (really an accepted fudge) is to use case-masking 'those' / 'the people' / 'all' / 'those of us'. But a complete rephrasing is arguably better: 'We hate him;/ and we will yell at him.'
May 14 at 13:28 comment added Yosef Baskin The structure has no elegant solution.
May 14 at 13:17 history edited KillingTime CC BY-SA 4.0
added 11 characters in body; edited tags
S May 14 at 13:15 review First questions
May 14 at 13:18
S May 14 at 13:15 history asked James CC BY-SA 4.0