Timeline for "must" vs "be required to"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8 at 21:12 | history | edited | Drew | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| May 8 at 18:54 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 8 at 13:28 | comment | added | Yosef Baskin | This concern of being too bossy is characteristic of Boomers suspicious of authority. But it's not. Must is clear, that's all. However, using third person user walks the writer into this trap, whereas second person avoids it all, including he/she, his/her: Fill out, Complete, Click OK. | |
| May 8 at 13:11 | comment | added | Henry | Try the UK Highway Code for drivers and other road users issued by the government. It uses must in contrast to should, for example in rule 97. The aim to is to get road users to obey the law and behave well. | |
| May 8 at 9:35 | answer | added | Edwin Ashworth | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 8 at 9:15 | history | edited | Happy Hippopotamus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| May 8 at 9:15 | history | edited | Happy Hippopotamus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| S May 8 at 9:10 | review | First questions | |||
| May 8 at 9:23 | |||||
| S May 8 at 9:10 | history | asked | Happy Hippopotamus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |