Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 3, 2013 at 4:44 answer added Jay Sigal timeline score: 0
Mar 3, 2013 at 0:52 answer added MikeR timeline score: -1
Mar 14, 2012 at 10:44 history edited Hugo CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed tag
Mar 4, 2012 at 21:54 comment added Yoichi Oishi @FumbleFingers. Your hint that Limbaugh had “reductio ad absurdum” in his mind in making his apology is helpful, and makes the intent of his message clearer to me. His logic was mandating health insurance to cover contraceptives for women is absordum, therefore Ms Fluke who publicly supports the plan is absordum (and a slut!). And he acknowledged that he had chosen the wrong word in his analogy of the situation.
Mar 4, 2012 at 17:32 comment added FumbleFingers To illustrate the absurd with absurdity isn't at all common phrasing, but to use reductio ad absurdum is probably what Limbaugh means, and that is common.
Mar 4, 2012 at 11:06 comment added Yoichi Oishi @jwpat7. My apology. It was New York Times article written by Brian Stelter. But the title of the article wasn’t “Obama backs student in furor with Limbaugh on birth control,” but was “Limbaugh Sorry for Attack on Student in Birth Control Furor,” and issue date was March 3, not March 2. I confounded it with the title of the previous day’s article, “Obama backs student in furor with Limbaugh on birth control. Link of the article in question is www.nytimes.com/pages/national/index.html
Mar 4, 2012 at 8:35 vote accept Yoichi Oishi
Mar 4, 2012 at 6:58 comment added James Waldby - jwpat7 Do you have a link to the article?
Mar 4, 2012 at 6:19 history edited Yoichi Oishi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Mar 4, 2012 at 5:50 history edited Robusto CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Mar 4, 2012 at 5:49 answer added Robusto timeline score: 6
Mar 4, 2012 at 5:48 answer added Jim timeline score: 3
Mar 4, 2012 at 5:47 history edited Yoichi Oishi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Mar 4, 2012 at 5:41 history asked Yoichi Oishi CC BY-SA 3.0