Skip to main content
added 3 characters in body
Source Link
Shoe
  • 33.5k
  • 4
  • 56
  • 108

In this context "that" is an anaphoric (backward-pointing) pronoun referring to "body". In other words, "the body is the body of a man..." . An alternative pronoun that also fits here is "one".

The construction can certainly be used in other contexts. For example,

  • The dress is that of a person who has more money than taste.
  • Your answer is that of someone who knows nothing about the subject.

As to whether "that" is redundant here, I suspect views will differ. I find its omission only marginally acceptable in your example, but not at all in my examples.

In this context "that" is an anaphoric (backward-pointing) pronoun referring to "body". In other words, "the body is the body of a man..." . An alternative pronoun that also fits here is "one".

The construction can certainly be used in other contexts. For example,

  • The dress is that of a person who has more money than taste.
  • Your answer is that of someone who knows nothing about the subject.

As to whether "that" is redundant here, I suspect views will differ. I find its omission only marginally acceptable in your example, but not all in my examples.

In this context "that" is an anaphoric (backward-pointing) pronoun referring to "body". In other words, "the body is the body of a man..." . An alternative pronoun that also fits here is "one".

The construction can certainly be used in other contexts. For example,

  • The dress is that of a person who has more money than taste.
  • Your answer is that of someone who knows nothing about the subject.

As to whether "that" is redundant here, I suspect views will differ. I find its omission only marginally acceptable in your example, but not at all in my examples.

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Shoe
  • 33.5k
  • 4
  • 56
  • 108

In this context "that" is an anaphoric (backward-pointing) pronoun referring to "body". In other words, "the body is the body of a man..." . An alternative pronoun that also fits here is "one".

The construction can certainly be used in other contexts. For example,

  • The dress is that of a person who has more money than taste.
  • Your answer is that of someone who knows nothing about the subject.

As to whether that"that" is redundant here, I suspect views will differ. I find its omission only marginally acceptable in your example, but not all in my examples.

In this context "that" is an anaphoric (backward-pointing) pronoun referring to "body". In other words, "the body is the body of a man..." . An alternative pronoun that also fits here is "one".

The construction can certainly be used in other contexts. For example,

  • The dress is that of a person who has more money than taste.
  • Your answer is that of someone who knows nothing about the subject.

As to whether that is redundant here, I suspect views will differ. I find its omission only marginally acceptable in your example, but not all in my examples.

In this context "that" is an anaphoric (backward-pointing) pronoun referring to "body". In other words, "the body is the body of a man..." . An alternative pronoun that also fits here is "one".

The construction can certainly be used in other contexts. For example,

  • The dress is that of a person who has more money than taste.
  • Your answer is that of someone who knows nothing about the subject.

As to whether "that" is redundant here, I suspect views will differ. I find its omission only marginally acceptable in your example, but not all in my examples.

Source Link
Shoe
  • 33.5k
  • 4
  • 56
  • 108

In this context "that" is an anaphoric (backward-pointing) pronoun referring to "body". In other words, "the body is the body of a man..." . An alternative pronoun that also fits here is "one".

The construction can certainly be used in other contexts. For example,

  • The dress is that of a person who has more money than taste.
  • Your answer is that of someone who knows nothing about the subject.

As to whether that is redundant here, I suspect views will differ. I find its omission only marginally acceptable in your example, but not all in my examples.