Timeline for Two 'x's in "anti-vaxxer"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 7, 2021 at 1:05 | comment | added | desbest | You could replace the part I quoted with something innocent with neutral charge yet off key like "uses a straw to drink from a can" or "walks with the clothing tag still on their clothes" and my answer would still be valid, just that something had to suggested to denote the level of extremity the thing holds as a comparison or equivalent. | |
Jun 7, 2021 at 0:51 | comment | added | desbest | It's not enough to define a pejorative using its literal meaning (ie. against vaccines) because the OP already knows that, but also to describe the connotations that the pejorative entails. I was talking figuratively, not literally. If you thought the part you quoted in your comment was my opinion or soundbite, then you're mistaken and mis-read. | |
Jun 7, 2021 at 0:44 | comment | added | desbest | My answer isn't rude or abusive. I never called anti-vaxxers those things. I said that that's the impression having two x's in the word instead of one, conveys. For one to explain how two x's in the word makes it a pejorative (which the OP seems to not be aware of), one must then explain what negative stereotype is associated with the pejorative. | |
Jun 6, 2021 at 19:20 | review | Low quality posts | |||
Jun 9, 2021 at 14:49 | |||||
Jun 6, 2021 at 19:14 | history | edited | desbest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 56 characters in body
|
Jun 6, 2021 at 19:07 | history | edited | desbest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 746 characters in body
|
Jun 6, 2021 at 19:00 | history | answered | desbest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |