Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 11, 2021 at 15:41 comment added Edwin Ashworth The second-listed earlier thread contains 'semantic shift' and the sub-category of narrowing.
Feb 11, 2021 at 15:39 history duplicates list edited Edwin Ashworth duplicates list edited from How do you refer to a hyponym that is the same word as the hypernym? to How do you refer to a hyponym that is the same word as the hypernym?, Single-word request for words that do not mean quite the same thing as before
Feb 11, 2021 at 7:07 review Reopen votes
Feb 12, 2021 at 13:21
Feb 11, 2021 at 6:48 history edited Erics CC BY-SA 4.0
added 112 characters in body
Feb 10, 2021 at 15:53 history closed Edwin Ashworth single-word-requests Duplicate of How do you refer to a hyponym that is the same word as the hypernym?
Feb 10, 2021 at 5:06 history edited Erics CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Feb 10, 2021 at 4:56 history edited Erics CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3rd example, clarified intent of examples
Feb 10, 2021 at 4:55 comment added Erics @KannE Who knows. Kids these days, constantly evolving the language. Bah humbug =)
Feb 10, 2021 at 4:42 comment added Erics @PhilSweet Ooh, nice .. sense itself has polysemy, of which it sounds like there are a particualar two that are mostly the same but differing in precision (i.e. general usage vs lexicographical). I am unfamiliar with this lexicographic sense you mention, but it's led me to academic.oup.com/ijl/article-abstract/8/1/1/923391 as a starter. All a bit above my paygrade though. Thanks!
Feb 10, 2021 at 4:37 comment added Erics @KannE I used the word "colloquial" in the sense of "used in ordinary or familiar conversation; not formal or literary" — doesn't that fit "widely accepted definition"?
Feb 10, 2021 at 4:33 comment added Erics @EdwinAshworth Thanks! Not polysemy - that the word "chair" has multiple senses (both verbs and nouns) isn't the sense I was aiming at. Contranym is closer than polysemy, at least in that the two definitions are in conflict, and that careless usage can lead to confusion, but still not quite what I seek in that the definitions are opposites (the sense I seek is along the narrower/broader axis, but without the abstracting that hyponymy describes).
Feb 9, 2021 at 15:57 comment added Edwin Ashworth no term meaning 'degree of polysemy', 'total number of senses found in OED plus academic, business and legal works' or 'confusability rating'.
Feb 9, 2021 at 15:57 comment added Edwin Ashworth Does the accepted answer here answer your question? Can a secondary definition violate / negate the first definition?. The concepts of hypernymy/hyponymy and polysemy are covered comprehensively elsewhere. 'Dictionary definitions' are what you find in standard dictionaries (though there may be conflict even in general usage), while agencies, institutions etc may apply precising or (when there is ensuing conflict) stipulative definitions. I know of ...
Feb 9, 2021 at 6:59 answer added Xanne timeline score: 0
Feb 9, 2021 at 4:36 answer added Elliot timeline score: 0
Feb 9, 2021 at 4:14 comment added Xanne Chemical-free soup! Yay!
Feb 9, 2021 at 3:58 comment added Peter @KannE, can you provide references to support your claim that "chemical" is defined as being dangerous and not natural?
Feb 9, 2021 at 3:49 comment added Phil Sweet I think you want sense (which of course has a regular meaning, and a special lexicographical one, as it should).
Feb 9, 2021 at 1:55 history asked Erics CC BY-SA 4.0