Skip to main content
deleted 10 characters in body
Source Link

I have a question about the use of the subjunctive in this sentence: If all the schools were to implement this program, which now exists only in the lower grades, then five years from now we will not have parents complaining that their teen-aged children still can't read.

There are a lot of internet examples that follow this pattern. Example: If that were to happen, then we will take appropriate action.

Would it be better to substitute "would" for "will" in both examples? Or, perhapsor "should" for "were to"?

I have a question about the use of the subjunctive in this sentence: If all the schools were to implement this program, which now exists only in the lower grades, then five years from now we will not have parents complaining that their teen-aged children still can't read.

There are a lot of internet examples that follow this pattern. Example: If that were to happen, then we will take appropriate action.

Would it be better to substitute "would" for "will" in both examples? Or, perhaps "should" for "were to"?

I have a question about the use of the subjunctive in this sentence: If all the schools were to implement this program, which now exists only in the lower grades, then five years from now we will not have parents complaining that their teen-aged children still can't read.

There are a lot of internet examples that follow this pattern. Example: If that were to happen, then we will take appropriate action.

Would it be better to substitute "would" for "will" in both examples, or "should" for "were to"?

added 29 characters in body
Source Link

I have a question about the use of the subjunctive in this sentence: If all the schools were to implement this program, which now exists only in the lower grades, then five years from now we will not have parents complaining that their teen-aged children still can't read.

There are a lot of internet examples that follow this pattern. Example: If that were to happen, then we will take appropriate action.

Is there any rule that the subjunctive shouldWould it be followed by the conditionalbetter to substitute "would" for "will" in both examples? Or, perhaps "should" for "were to"?

I have a question about the use of the subjunctive in this sentence: If all the schools were to implement this program, which now exists only in the lower grades, then five years from now we will not have parents complaining that their teen-aged children still can't read.

There are a lot of internet examples that follow this pattern. Example: If that were to happen, then we will take appropriate action.

Is there any rule that the subjunctive should be followed by the conditional?

I have a question about the use of the subjunctive in this sentence: If all the schools were to implement this program, which now exists only in the lower grades, then five years from now we will not have parents complaining that their teen-aged children still can't read.

There are a lot of internet examples that follow this pattern. Example: If that were to happen, then we will take appropriate action.

Would it be better to substitute "would" for "will" in both examples? Or, perhaps "should" for "were to"?

deleted 140 characters in body
Source Link

I have a question about the use of the subjunctive in this sentence: If all the schools were to implement this program, which now exists only in the lower grades, then five years from now we will not have parents complaining that their teen-aged children still can't read.

There are a lot of internet examples that follow this pattern. Example: If that were to happen, then we will take appropriate action.

Is there any rule that the subjunctive should be followed by the conditional? In the first example I gave, the conditional "would" seems odd when speaking of something that may or may not happen five years from now.

I have a question about the use of the subjunctive in this sentence: If all the schools were to implement this program, which now exists only in the lower grades, then five years from now we will not have parents complaining that their teen-aged children still can't read.

There are a lot of internet examples that follow this pattern. Example: If that were to happen, then we will take appropriate action.

Is there any rule that the subjunctive should be followed by the conditional? In the first example I gave, the conditional "would" seems odd when speaking of something that may or may not happen five years from now.

I have a question about the use of the subjunctive in this sentence: If all the schools were to implement this program, which now exists only in the lower grades, then five years from now we will not have parents complaining that their teen-aged children still can't read.

There are a lot of internet examples that follow this pattern. Example: If that were to happen, then we will take appropriate action.

Is there any rule that the subjunctive should be followed by the conditional?

deleted 784 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
more examples
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading