Skip to main content
added 83 characters in body
Source Link
Laurel
  • 67.3k
  • 10
  • 157
  • 227

Why not reword to avoid confusion?

...within the callback, the length of char should always be 1.

and, as you suggested,

...char instances are defined in multiple scopes...


EDIT: AddedHere are some style guide references to support my answer.

Yahoo style manualYahoo style manual recommends re-wording, as does reference.comreference.com, and The manual of scientific style: a guide for authors, editors, and researchers By Harold Rabinowitz section 3.6.7.ii-iii

On the other hand, the Chicago Manual of Style says

The plural of a word or phrase in quotation marks is now formed without anapostrophe—that is, with the addition of s or es within the quotation marks. Note the example: “To be continueds”

Although it does not address possessives of items in quotes.

Why not reword to avoid confusion?

...within the callback, the length of char should always be 1.

and, as you suggested,

...char instances are defined in multiple scopes...


EDIT: Added some style guide references to support my answer.

Yahoo style manual recommends re-wording, as does reference.com, and The manual of scientific style: a guide for authors, editors, and researchers By Harold Rabinowitz section 3.6.7.ii-iii

On the other hand, the Chicago Manual of Style says

The plural of a word or phrase in quotation marks is now formed without anapostrophe—that is, with the addition of s or es within the quotation marks. Note the example: “To be continueds”

Although it does not address possessives of items in quotes.

Why not reword to avoid confusion?

...within the callback, the length of char should always be 1.

and, as you suggested,

...char instances are defined in multiple scopes...


Here are some style guide references to support my answer.

Yahoo style manual recommends re-wording, as does reference.com, and The manual of scientific style: a guide for authors, editors, and researchers By Harold Rabinowitz section 3.6.7.ii-iii

On the other hand, the Chicago Manual of Style says

The plural of a word or phrase in quotation marks is now formed without anapostrophe—that is, with the addition of s or es within the quotation marks. Note the example: “To be continueds”

Although it does not address possessives of items in quotes.

References
Source Link
Mark Beadles
  • 22.7k
  • 3
  • 77
  • 100

Why not reword to avoid confusion?

...within the callback, the length of char should always be 1.

and, as you suggested,

...char instances are defined in multiple scopes...


EDIT: Added some style guide references to support my answer.

Yahoo style manual recommends re-wording, as does reference.com, and The manual of scientific style: a guide for authors, editors, and researchers By Harold Rabinowitz section 3.6.7.ii-iii

On the other hand, the Chicago Manual of Style says

The plural of a word or phrase in quotation marks is now formed without anapostrophe—that is, with the addition of s or es within the quotation marks. Note the example: “To be continueds”

Although it does not address possessives of items in quotes.

Why not reword to avoid confusion?

...within the callback, the length of char should always be 1.

and, as you suggested,

...char instances are defined in multiple scopes...

Why not reword to avoid confusion?

...within the callback, the length of char should always be 1.

and, as you suggested,

...char instances are defined in multiple scopes...


EDIT: Added some style guide references to support my answer.

Yahoo style manual recommends re-wording, as does reference.com, and The manual of scientific style: a guide for authors, editors, and researchers By Harold Rabinowitz section 3.6.7.ii-iii

On the other hand, the Chicago Manual of Style says

The plural of a word or phrase in quotation marks is now formed without anapostrophe—that is, with the addition of s or es within the quotation marks. Note the example: “To be continueds”

Although it does not address possessives of items in quotes.

Source Link
Mark Beadles
  • 22.7k
  • 3
  • 77
  • 100

Why not reword to avoid confusion?

...within the callback, the length of char should always be 1.

and, as you suggested,

...char instances are defined in multiple scopes...