Timeline for Numeral prefixes of tidal constituents [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2020 at 12:09 | history | closed |
Edwin Ashworth CJ Dennis KillingTime Chappo Hasn't Forgotten Justin |
Opinion-based | |
| Jan 29, 2020 at 0:04 | comment | added | CJ Dennis | Surely you want a set of words that are easily understood, not necessarily etymologically consistent? | |
| Jan 28, 2020 at 14:45 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 30, 2020 at 12:09 | |||||
| Jan 28, 2020 at 2:21 | comment | added | Felipe G. Nievinski | The next question then is: which inconsistent set should be adopted -- for example, in Wikipedia? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_tides#Tidal_constituents | |
| Jan 28, 2020 at 2:19 | history | edited | Felipe G. Nievinski | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 74 characters in body
|
| Jan 28, 2020 at 2:16 | comment | added | Peter Shor | Is there anything wrong with inconsistent prefixes? We use triangles, quadrilaterals and pentagons, from Latin and Greek. I don't see anybody calling for us to use quintalateral or tetragon. | |
| Jan 28, 2020 at 2:14 | history | edited | Felipe G. Nievinski | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 166 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jan 28, 2020 at 2:12 | history | edited | tchrist♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 28, 2020 at 2:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 28, 2020 at 2:14 | |||||
| Jan 28, 2020 at 2:07 | history | asked | Felipe G. Nievinski | CC BY-SA 4.0 |