Timeline for The /ɪ/ sound vs the /i/ sound - exact difference?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2019 at 13:12 | vote | accept | BazAU | ||
| May 29, 2019 at 7:32 | comment | added | herisson | @BazAU: In some traditions, words like "proceeds" are transcribed with some stress on the second syllable: /ˈprəʊˌsiːdz/ (Balogné Bérces Katalin calls this "tertiary stress", in contrast to the more widely recognized secondary stress that occurs on a syllable preceding the accented/primary-stressed syllable). I made a post about it here: english.stackexchange.com/a/433879/77227 | |
| May 29, 2019 at 6:28 | comment | added | Lordology | @BazAU Correct. I have realised this was false─it's a matter of length. | |
| May 29, 2019 at 6:27 | history | edited | Lordology | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 48 characters in body
|
| May 29, 2019 at 6:26 | comment | added | BazAU | But /i:/ can be unstressed too: proceeds /ˈprəʊ.siːdz/. And if it's just a matter of stress, why should there be a distinction in the phonetic transcription, because other vowels are not using such a distinction! | |
| May 29, 2019 at 6:19 | history | edited | Lordology | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| May 29, 2019 at 6:10 | history | answered | Lordology | CC BY-SA 4.0 |