Skip to main content
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Yes, normally you would call such a person a hypocrite (exceptions include situations where actually the same standards should not apply for both persons).

However, hypocrite is a wider concept, that can be applied to anyone who is doing something different to what he is saying (in the domain of moral and ethics). So, to be a hypocrite I don't even need some specific person B, all I need to do is to claim that I have certain moral values but to disprove that through my actions.

It is completely appropriate to use it for essential moral values, but also for trivial things as well, for example if I point you to read the faqfaq on this site, but have not done that myself, it would be justified to call me a hypocrite.

There are many other phrases: 'to have double standards', 'to be two-faced' or simply phoney; see other synonyms and near synonyms of hypocrite here.

Yes, normally you would call such a person a hypocrite (exceptions include situations where actually the same standards should not apply for both persons).

However, hypocrite is a wider concept, that can be applied to anyone who is doing something different to what he is saying (in the domain of moral and ethics). So, to be a hypocrite I don't even need some specific person B, all I need to do is to claim that I have certain moral values but to disprove that through my actions.

It is completely appropriate to use it for essential moral values, but also for trivial things as well, for example if I point you to read the faq on this site, but have not done that myself, it would be justified to call me a hypocrite.

There are many other phrases: 'to have double standards', 'to be two-faced' or simply phoney; see other synonyms and near synonyms of hypocrite here.

Yes, normally you would call such a person a hypocrite (exceptions include situations where actually the same standards should not apply for both persons).

However, hypocrite is a wider concept, that can be applied to anyone who is doing something different to what he is saying (in the domain of moral and ethics). So, to be a hypocrite I don't even need some specific person B, all I need to do is to claim that I have certain moral values but to disprove that through my actions.

It is completely appropriate to use it for essential moral values, but also for trivial things as well, for example if I point you to read the faq on this site, but have not done that myself, it would be justified to call me a hypocrite.

There are many other phrases: 'to have double standards', 'to be two-faced' or simply phoney; see other synonyms and near synonyms of hypocrite here.

Source Link
Unreason
  • 12.5k
  • 35
  • 54

Yes, normally you would call such a person a hypocrite (exceptions include situations where actually the same standards should not apply for both persons).

However, hypocrite is a wider concept, that can be applied to anyone who is doing something different to what he is saying (in the domain of moral and ethics). So, to be a hypocrite I don't even need some specific person B, all I need to do is to claim that I have certain moral values but to disprove that through my actions.

It is completely appropriate to use it for essential moral values, but also for trivial things as well, for example if I point you to read the faq on this site, but have not done that myself, it would be justified to call me a hypocrite.

There are many other phrases: 'to have double standards', 'to be two-faced' or simply phoney; see other synonyms and near synonyms of hypocrite here.