Timeline for "being" usage as relative clause
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 23:09 | vote | accept | Soner from The Ottoman Empire | ||
| Apr 21, 2019 at 17:03 | comment | added | Greg Lee | No, "with" can't be omitted (unless, in other examples, the entire subject is omitted). IMO, the example you give is ungrammatical. | |
| Apr 21, 2019 at 7:51 | comment | added | Soner from The Ottoman Empire | So can it be written also without "with" as Even the model of memory being just physical memory, several options are possible. Is it also right and have same meaning? | |
| Apr 21, 2019 at 7:46 | vote | accept | Soner from The Ottoman Empire | ||
| Apr 21, 2019 at 7:46 | |||||
| Apr 20, 2019 at 22:09 | history | answered | Greg Lee | CC BY-SA 4.0 |