Timeline for Comma here? "The store is impressive, yet thoughtful, and it feels like home"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 7, 2019 at 14:40 | history | edited | Jesse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed opinions
|
| Jan 7, 2019 at 9:35 | history | edited | Jesse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 225 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2019 at 4:01 | comment | added | vectory | That's what I was saying? You need to open the concessive clause, before closing it. However, the second example in the question shows use of the oxford comma. Anyhow, the second is needed for similar reasons and those apply to the first comma, too, whether the subclause is parenthetical or not. I do prefer your idea about "adding more information": Lists are comma separated (The store is thoughtful, impressive, and feels like home). However, and does regularly not need a comma, so why would yet? This is a quote from advertising. I don't think we need to be critical about the grammar. | |
| Jan 7, 2019 at 3:48 | history | edited | Jesse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 93 characters in body; added 12 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2019 at 3:47 | comment | added | Jesse | No, you need to close the concessive clause. | |
| Jan 7, 2019 at 3:46 | comment | added | vectory | but the implicit question, why one would set the second comma but not the first one, kinda shows that both commas are rather similar. | |
| Jan 7, 2019 at 3:33 | history | edited | Jesse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
More information; added 2 characters in body; deleted 30 characters in body; added 95 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2019 at 3:26 | history | answered | Jesse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |