Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 2, 2022 at 12:02 history edited Colm CC BY-SA 4.0
Clarified use of shortened phrase in response to comments
Sep 17, 2018 at 23:20 comment added jpmc26 Answer is correct, but first example does not exemplify the saying in full.
Sep 17, 2018 at 14:38 comment added Richard Ward @Fattie I have never come across the limitation of it only ever referring to a single event. It can refer to a single event, sure, but it's not limited to just meaning that.
Sep 17, 2018 at 13:54 comment added Edheldil @Fattie - I doubt that #2 fits, much less better - it's an idiom about an action amplification, not necessarily st. bad, is not it? Could you say "Publishing magazine email address opened floodgate to readers' submissions and reviews"? Whereas #1 contains the element of exploiting someone's goodwill, like in OP question.
Sep 16, 2018 at 9:14 comment added Fattie The long trivial, side-issue, comments here are irrelevant and should be deleted. Thanks in advance for doing that promptly. While this idiom is in the general region of the OP's question, it's not really the same.
Sep 15, 2018 at 19:07 comment added Richard Ward @Chieron The taking of 'a mile' does not necessarily refer to a single event. The giving of an inch might be just lending a teabag when the office caddy is empty. A couple of days later, they come back to ask for another; you didn't mind last time, after all. Pretty soon, you're supplying the whole building with tea - they've taken a mile.
S Sep 15, 2018 at 8:53 history suggested robert bristow-johnson CC BY-SA 4.0
I think the subject was missing in the statement.
Sep 15, 2018 at 7:51 comment added Chieron How does #1 fit here? The Indian expression means that getting taken advantage of once will mean that you will always be used (by appealing to precedent or by becoming a default weak target). You've shown your weakness and it will be exploited. The important aspect is the setting of a precedent. #1 rather refers to a singular event - you offer help / yield a small point, but they take you by surprise and you have to do much more. #2 fits much better - though it still has more of an active component on your side (you are actively opening the gates, not necessarily under pressure).
Sep 15, 2018 at 1:25 review Suggested edits
S Sep 15, 2018 at 8:53
Sep 14, 2018 at 22:30 vote accept AMN
Sep 14, 2018 at 16:38 comment added WGroleau @Spratty: perhaps you lot are just nicer. Most Americans would definitely take the whole mile if they had the chance. Not me though. I’d just take a kilometer.
Sep 14, 2018 at 15:25 comment added Spratty @AndyT - For full disclosure I'm from Essex (I can actually see Kent from the sea-shore a few minutes' walk from my house).
Sep 14, 2018 at 15:23 comment added Colm @KR that's an interesting observation. I had always assumed that one derived from the other but not necessarily I suppose. I wanted to add usage context in the example whilst keeping it short. In truth, the phrase is a complete sentence on its own.
Sep 14, 2018 at 15:17 comment added AndyT @Spratty - It'd have to be more a more specific region than "SE England". I grew up in Kent and I've never heard your version.
Sep 14, 2018 at 14:59 comment added KRyan Your example for #1 doesn’t actually use it? And merely “give an inch” is not necessarily an allusion to someone taking a mile: in your expectation, I would presume that John objected to even the inch, rather than being concerned about them then taking the mile.
Sep 14, 2018 at 14:40 comment added Spratty British English here - for #1 the most common version I've heard spoken is "give them and inch and they'll take a yard", but that may be regional (SE England).
Sep 14, 2018 at 14:17 comment added UnhandledExcepSean American here: #1 is definitely the phrase I most commonly would use or hear.
Sep 14, 2018 at 13:40 vote accept AMN
Sep 14, 2018 at 13:40
Sep 14, 2018 at 13:07 history edited user 66974 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 116 characters in body
Sep 14, 2018 at 12:05 review First posts
Sep 14, 2018 at 12:24
Sep 14, 2018 at 12:00 history answered Colm CC BY-SA 4.0