Skip to main content
English Language & Usage

Return to Answer

deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
Eilia
Eilia
  • 5.5k
  • 14
  • 48
  • 80

I know it's not quite fully accurate, but to communicate the essenseessence that you're trying to convey, I'd actually use unprecidenctedunprecedented.

There is an unprecendentedunprecedented relationship between concept A and B.

Whilst the nameplate value for the word is never having happened or existed in the past it carries the tones of of exceedingly high value that I think you're trying to convey.

I know it's not quite fully accurate, but to communicate the essense that you're trying to convey, I'd actually use unprecidencted.

There is an unprecendented relationship between concept A and B.

Whilst the nameplate value for the word is never having happened or existed in the past it carries the tones of of exceedingly high value that I think you're trying to convey.

I know it's not quite fully accurate, but to communicate the essence that you're trying to convey, I'd actually use unprecedented.

There is an unprecedented relationship between concept A and B.

Whilst the nameplate value for the word is never having happened or existed in the past it carries the tones of of exceedingly high value that I think you're trying to convey.

Source Link
Racheet
Racheet
  • 337
  • 1
  • 3
  • 12

I know it's not quite fully accurate, but to communicate the essense that you're trying to convey, I'd actually use unprecidencted.

There is an unprecendented relationship between concept A and B.

Whilst the nameplate value for the word is never having happened or existed in the past it carries the tones of of exceedingly high value that I think you're trying to convey.