Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 19, 2022 at 2:18 history edited Laurel CC BY-SA 4.0
removed "code"
Jun 12, 2018 at 20:55 comment added Barmar Now that's obscure :)
Jun 12, 2018 at 20:53 comment added Bjonnfesk Not omnirelevant would be the Latin way, for instance Non omniaptus, but perhaps English should have had a word like aliquirelevant: Relevant to some. This would have formed the sentence This formula is aliquirelevant and may vary, avoiding the possibly awkward negation. How would you suggest I convey my meaning more clearly? I did not wish it to seem like I was proposing it for that reason.
Jun 12, 2018 at 20:43 comment added Barmar OK, the way you wrote it seemed like you were proposing it because it's more obscure. I think the OP's approach of negating a word like this is misguided ("not omnirelevant" seems awkward), and perhaps he should be looking for a word that expresses the negative concept by itself. But that's not your problem.
Jun 12, 2018 at 20:38 comment added Bjonnfesk I made no mention as to its preferability, I only wished to make its availability known, despite its obscurity :). Why the asker found it preferable I can only guess at; possibly it fit the tone of his work better. I would also posit that despite being little used, the meaning of omnirelevant can be readily deduced by most speakers of the language, as it is composed of a relatively common prefix with an established meaning and a common word. Therefore, the usual reason for avoiding obscure words is voided, and more freedom is afforded to the author.
Jun 12, 2018 at 20:30 comment added Barmar Why is a more obscure word preferable?
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:23 history edited Bjonnfesk CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:04 review First posts
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:14
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:02 history edited Bjonnfesk CC BY-SA 4.0
added 294 characters in body
Jun 12, 2018 at 18:55 vote accept Proximus19
Jun 13, 2018 at 1:05
Jun 12, 2018 at 18:55 vote accept Proximus19
Jun 12, 2018 at 18:55
Jun 12, 2018 at 18:53 history answered Bjonnfesk CC BY-SA 4.0