Timeline for 'summarized' and 'traveling' are not British English?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2017 at 0:59 | comment | added | herisson | ... and double "ll" is a special case and British English speakers don't generally double other letters after unstressed "short" vowels —e.g. "reckon" + "-ed" = "reckoned" not "reckonned", "bracket" + "-ed" = "bracketed" not "bracketted") | |
| Aug 16, 2017 at 0:58 | vote | accept | Tony | ||
| Aug 16, 2017 at 0:57 | comment | added | herisson | Hello Vocoder; just so you know, this question is (in a way) a duplicate of some previously-asked questions. While the entire question probably has not been asked before, there are a number of prior questions that cover the topics of "-ise" vs "-ize" spellings and double "ll" in British English verb forms. I posted some links in the comments above; I would recommend looking at the answers there and maybe updating your answer to incorporate some of the more detailed information they have (e.g. "-ize" is also possible in British English,... | |
| Aug 16, 2017 at 0:49 | history | answered | Vocoder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |