Timeline for Possession with monarch names
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 26, 2017 at 2:29 | comment | added | Noldorin | Yes, the "of" form is quite acceptable in all these cases. It's a matter of taste, largely. | |
| Mar 25, 2017 at 23:18 | comment | added | Animadversor | What Noldorin has written is correct. However, the succession of sibilants in close proximity in “Olaf II's succession" might seem distasteful to some, in which case one could speak instead of “the succession of Olaf II." | |
| Mar 25, 2017 at 20:22 | comment | added | Eragon20 | Great. Good to know. | |
| Mar 25, 2017 at 20:21 | comment | added | Noldorin | No problem. FYI, I believe the same applies to epithets, like "Charles the Bald's" or "Peter the Great's" — in case you were wondering... | |
| Mar 25, 2017 at 20:19 | comment | added | Eragon20 | Thank you! That's what I thought! I would give you a +1 if I had enough reputation to do so! | |
| Mar 25, 2017 at 20:16 | vote | accept | Eragon20 | ||
| Mar 25, 2017 at 20:14 | history | answered | Noldorin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |