Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 18, 2017 at 1:43 history edited Mark Hubbard CC BY-SA 3.0
added 39 characters in body
Jan 18, 2017 at 1:36 history edited Mark Hubbard CC BY-SA 3.0
added 39 characters in body
Jan 18, 2017 at 0:11 comment added Edwin Ashworth The M-W definition (which I'm glad to find) is the one not to argue with. The term 'synonym' becomes useless if all the conditions your linked article (which is very good apart from terminology) mentions are demanded. // 'Not always interchangeable' expresses the idea.
Jan 17, 2017 at 23:51 comment added Tom22 if we consider this definition of 'informal' -having a relaxed, friendly, or unofficial style, manner, or nature- it sort of casts a bit more flavor on what formal "is not"
Jan 17, 2017 at 19:37 comment added Mark Hubbard @Edwin, I agree. I've now put the term "true synonyms" in quotes (with a link to a dictionary.com blog post that argues there is no such thing), but I can't speak for the creators of the Google dictionary. Should I remove the word "true" from my answer? Wouldn't it be presumptuous of me to claim the Google dictionary is wrong?
Jan 17, 2017 at 19:34 history edited Mark Hubbard CC BY-SA 3.0
added 61 characters in body
Jan 17, 2017 at 18:59 comment added NVZ Just FYI: Google Dictionary borrows definitions from ODO most of the time.
Jan 17, 2017 at 18:53 history edited Mark Hubbard CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 5 characters in body
Jan 17, 2017 at 17:24 comment added Edwin Ashworth What are 'true synonyms'? The only useful definition for synonym[s] I've seen given on ELU (and it's not, to my knowledge, been challenged) is 'two or more words having the same or very nearly the same meaning in at least some of their senses'.
Jan 17, 2017 at 17:16 history edited Mark Hubbard CC BY-SA 3.0
added 63 characters in body
Jan 17, 2017 at 16:49 history edited Mark Hubbard CC BY-SA 3.0
added 12 characters in body
Jan 17, 2017 at 16:42 history answered Mark Hubbard CC BY-SA 3.0