Timeline for "A rumor circulated [that the queen had eaten her own child]" Is this extraposition? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2021 at 16:03 | comment | added | Araucaria - Him | @Edwin Ashworth See my comment above and either retract close-vote or find an appropriate dupe. | |
| Jul 15, 2021 at 16:01 | comment | added | Araucaria - Him | @fev Please see my comment above and retract the inappropriate dupe vote. | |
| Jul 15, 2021 at 16:00 | comment | added | Araucaria - Him | @decapitatedsoul You’ve closed this as a dupe of a question about relative clauses in which the answers only talk about relative clauses. There is no relative clause in this question, or in the answers here. Please retract the close-vote. | |
| Jul 13, 2021 at 11:57 | history | closed |
Edwin Ashworth fev Rayan Khan |
Duplicate of Position of a relative clause before/after a verb | |
| Jul 13, 2021 at 11:51 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 13, 2021 at 11:57 | |||||
| Nov 16, 2016 at 12:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/798866362206535680 | ||
| Nov 15, 2016 at 22:33 | comment | added | Alan Carmack | I agree with the rollback of the title. The version with eating babies bordered on, if not crossed the line to, sensationalism. @deadrat And I rarely see eye to eye with Rathony | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 20:13 | comment | added | deadrat | Let us continue this discussion in chat. | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 20:02 | comment | added | user140086 | @deadrat The issue is this. There are helpful edits (that I want to make on this community) and unhelpful edits (that I want to avoid or roll back). I don't see any helpfulness in the 5th and 6th edits. It's my judgment and I have the privilege to roll it back. That's why I rolled it back. If you don't find my rollback helpful, you have every right to roll my edit back again multiple times. I just hope it won't lead to edit war. Why would it be kinda sad? I also think it is kinda sad because we don't have many experts who really know what they are talking about. | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 19:58 | comment | added | deadrat | @Rathony "I laughed ... It's really funny." No, kinda sad, actually. | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 19:57 | comment | added | deadrat | @Rathony It sounded fine to me, as I understood it as a reference to the sentence in the actual question. Now, I'd already read the original, so maybe my understanding is no guide. And the title change is a minor matter, so your reversal was only marginally rude. The focus issue was about Araucaria's simplification of the sentence given in the question. You objected to and reversed that as well, no? | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 19:13 | history | rollback | user140086 |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| Nov 15, 2016 at 15:59 | history | edited | Araucaria - Him | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 15, 2016 at 15:57 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 16, 2016 at 12:24 | |||||
| Nov 15, 2016 at 15:53 | history | edited | Araucaria - Him | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 15, 2016 at 15:52 | answer | added | Araucaria - Him | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 13:29 | history | edited | Araucaria - Him | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 15, 2016 at 12:52 | history | edited | Araucaria - Him | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 15, 2016 at 12:28 | history | edited | tchrist♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 15, 2016 at 10:24 | answer | added | BillJ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 15, 2016 at 4:14 | history | asked | William | CC BY-SA 3.0 |