Timeline for 'in contact with' vs 'at contact with'
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016 at 16:54 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 23, 2016 at 18:33 | |||||
| Sep 23, 2016 at 16:34 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | In the first of your second set of examples, at is syntactically tied to their attempts at [doing something], so it's not the same usage. Nor is the third example there (it begins at the time of contact). And so far as I'm concerned the second example is simply "wrong" (almost every native speaker would use in there, as with the first three examples). | |
| S Sep 23, 2016 at 7:18 | history | suggested | user189910 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improper reference
|
| Sep 23, 2016 at 7:12 | answer | added | user189910 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 23, 2016 at 7:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 23, 2016 at 7:18 | |||||
| Sep 23, 2016 at 6:40 | history | asked | Ébe Isaac | CC BY-SA 3.0 |