Timeline for Construction "DID SEE" in literature
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2016 at 20:47 | comment | added | michael.hor257k | @EdwinAshworth As it happens, I wrote my answer before you flagged the question as a duplicate. Not that it matters much, because I don't think the other question provides an answer to this one - and I don't see why your opinion on this matter should take precedence over mine. | |
| Sep 18, 2016 at 20:41 | comment | added | Edwin Ashworth | I'm sorry, michael.hor257k, but accepting your opinion would lead to the question someone once asked here about the best way to keep goldfish being on-topic. I said flagged (ie pointed out) as a duplicate. As Janus Bahs Jacquet has said: '[Y]ou should always keep in mind the possibility of duplicates when reading (and answering) a question, and consider how likely a question is to be a duplicate. This one … [pretty] likely.' If the same questions keep being allowed and answered, the site degenerates into an inconsistent hotch-potch. | |
| Sep 18, 2016 at 18:12 | comment | added | michael.hor257k | @EdwinAshworth Answering a question already marked as duplicate is not possible. What you should really ask yourself is whether the answer helped the person asking for help. I am under the impression you forgot what this is all about, before anything else. | |
| Sep 18, 2016 at 17:47 | comment | added | Edwin Ashworth | This (1) is answering a question already flagged as a duplicate, (2) does not even mention emphatic do, and (3) gives no supporting evidence, just coming across as personal opinion about correctness. | |
| Sep 18, 2016 at 17:27 | vote | accept | kciray | ||
| Sep 18, 2016 at 17:22 | history | answered | michael.hor257k | CC BY-SA 3.0 |