Timeline for Is there any word for referring to expired and/or voided subscriptions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 5:06 | vote | accept | Reza Sameei | ||
| May 25, 2018 at 3:24 | |||||
| Oct 23, 2016 at 8:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/790103283205570560 | ||
| Oct 21, 2016 at 19:01 | answer | added | Bookeater | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 21, 2016 at 18:43 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 17:50 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 22, 2016 at 12:36 | comment | added | Lawrence | I'm a little hesitant about this, hence a comment rather than an answer. "Expired subscription" and "voided subscription" sound like oxymorons - if they're expired or voided, they're no longer subscriptions. The alternative terms lapsed subscription and cancelled subscription sound better to my ear, but appear to suffer from the same problem. If you're just after popular usage, Ngram may be helpful. | |
| Aug 22, 2016 at 10:31 | comment | added | JHCL | Why not "closed"? It suggests only that the subscription was once "open", or valid, without specifying a reason for closure. | |
| Aug 22, 2016 at 8:41 | comment | added | Helmar | I guess it depends what you want to include. Expired subscriptions will be the most common old / invalid ones. However, there are certainly other reasons for a subscription to end which expired may not adequately cover. | |
| Aug 22, 2016 at 8:19 | answer | added | someasw | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 22, 2016 at 7:38 | history | edited | pyobum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited for typos and grammar.
|
| Aug 22, 2016 at 6:57 | history | asked | Reza Sameei | CC BY-SA 3.0 |