Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 5, 2016 at 23:13 comment added Hot Licks I resemble that remark!
Jul 5, 2016 at 20:46 answer added ruakh timeline score: 2
Jul 4, 2016 at 4:53 comment added Sven Yargs How about "imcorrect affix"?
Jun 24, 2016 at 15:29 comment added CHEESE I believe the word is "nongrammatical"
Jun 21, 2016 at 22:50 comment added John Lawler Most of the various ways that people can misspeak have no special names. It's hard enough to remember all the words you do say, without having to remember the names for the words you don't say.
Jun 14, 2016 at 15:30 history tweeted twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/742741096996954113
Jun 10, 2016 at 12:31 comment added Max Williams Btw, this is relevant reading, while not the same question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/292531/… eg In general, words take un- when they are of English (Germanic) origin and in- if they come from Latin. (The forms im-, il-, and ir- are variations on in-.) ... the battle between in- and un- has been going on for centuries ... As an example, for several centuries English had both inability and unability, but the latter disappeared in the eighteenth century for no very obvious reason.
Jun 10, 2016 at 12:30 comment added Max Williams Do you mean a type of word which looks like it should be correct, logically, according to rules used with other words? If so then you should explain that in your question.
Jun 10, 2016 at 12:29 comment added Max Williams Me fail English? That's unpossible! (Ralph Wiggum)
Jun 10, 2016 at 11:08 comment added Colin Fine I don't know a specific word for it. It's not a grammatical error, it's a lexical one: simply using a word that doesn't exist.
Jun 10, 2016 at 8:51 comment added vickyace Pseudography comes close.
Jun 10, 2016 at 8:20 review First posts
Jun 10, 2016 at 9:04
Jun 10, 2016 at 8:18 history asked Lee CC BY-SA 3.0