Timeline for Word for citing from a primary source without properly citing it
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25 at 18:21 | comment | added | Edwin Ashworth | Simply a misquotation. It becomes acceptable (within limits) if introduced by 'To paraphrase X [in reference Y]' and put in italics rather than quotes. | |
| May 19, 2016 at 4:46 | answer | added | KWinker | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 18, 2016 at 23:08 | comment | added | Brian Donovan | In the case of a familiar quotation, exact citation is not necessarily expected or required, and might even be felt to insult the reader's intelligence and culture. (I note that "which should be given an exact reference" appears to be a non-restrictive relative clause.) | |
| May 18, 2016 at 22:11 | comment | added | Elliott Frisch | Lacking in "academic" rigor. | |
| May 18, 2016 at 22:03 | answer | added | Hungry | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 18, 2016 at 21:51 | answer | added | ab2 | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 18, 2016 at 21:34 | answer | added | Seth Kaplan | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 18, 2016 at 20:21 | comment | added | Mitch | 'improperly cited'? | |
| May 18, 2016 at 20:05 | history | asked | Daphne Preston-Kendal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |