Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 14, 2013 at 17:32 comment added Janus Bahs Jacquet A [noun/adjective/adverb]-er isn’t necessarily someone who makes use of [N/A/A]—it’s rather more vague than that. It’s just someone who is somehow or other associated with [N/A/A]. A foreigner, for instance, does not ‘use’ foreign lands, he is just generically associated with ‘foreign’. These words can be considered a type of determinative compounds, with the -er suffix functioning as the compound head.
Jul 6, 2012 at 20:03 comment added Daniel I see. So [noun]-er is someone who makes use of the [noun], and [verb]-er is someone who [verb]s. Makes complete sense to me now. It's just that it wasn't obvious that jail is a verb, especially when set side-by-side with prison.
Jul 6, 2012 at 20:01 comment added MT_Head @Danielδ - Other examples: pensioner (one who receives a pension), commoner (one who belongs to the commons)... probably a bunch of others, but my brain just ran dry.
Jul 4, 2011 at 1:33 vote accept Daniel
Jul 3, 2011 at 21:09 comment added Thursagen "jailer" is referring to 'a person who jails'. Jail is being used as verb. "prisoner" is 'a person who belongs to prison'. Prison is noun here.
Jul 3, 2011 at 13:48 vote accept Daniel
Jul 3, 2011 at 13:48
Jul 3, 2011 at 12:32 comment added Daniel That makes about halfway sense to me. But still - why then is "prisoner" a word at all?
Jul 3, 2011 at 9:33 history answered Robusto CC BY-SA 3.0