Timeline for Correct morphological parse of a word "indecipherable"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2016 at 15:11 | comment | added | ArnoldM | yes, definitely | |
| Mar 27, 2016 at 15:05 | comment | added | karu | So, we can limit the segmentation to cipher ? | |
| Mar 27, 2016 at 14:58 | comment | added | ArnoldM | "cipher" is the absolute stem. | |
| Mar 27, 2016 at 14:33 | comment | added | karu | which is the "correct" stem | |
| Mar 27, 2016 at 14:22 | comment | added | karu | could you please explain further ? | |
| Mar 27, 2016 at 13:44 | comment | added | ArnoldM | The recursion is the fact that a secondary parse is being included in a primary or parent parse, so this actually means that both parse forms that you had given as options should be unified into a comprehensive morphological parse; "decipher" is also a component that can be decomposed into standard grammatical units. The recursive (unified) morphological parse should illustrate this idea. | |
| Mar 27, 2016 at 13:22 | comment | added | karu | what do you mean ? | |
| Mar 27, 2016 at 12:38 | history | answered | ArnoldM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |