Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Feb 11, 2016 at 7:17 answer added Sven Yargs timeline score: 4
Feb 11, 2016 at 7:12 history edited Sven Yargs CC BY-SA 3.0
Formatting and some tag additions.
Dec 13, 2015 at 7:03 comment added Sven Yargs Note that if your publisher insisted on punctuating vs with a period, you could always spell out versus and avoid the issue that way.
Dec 13, 2015 at 4:44 comment added londonderry I agree, Ralph.m.
Dec 13, 2015 at 3:49 answer added NES timeline score: 2
Dec 13, 2015 at 3:31 comment added ralph.m Personally, I prefer vs not to have a period anyway. It's unnecessary—just as on Mr and Mrs etc. The period should only be used to indicate that the end of a word has been left off, which is not the case for vs (from versus) and Mr (from Mister). Wish you darned Americans would get it right. :p
Dec 13, 2015 at 2:51 comment added Hot Licks Same answer. Different answer if you're writing for The New Yorker or Sports Illustrated.
S Dec 13, 2015 at 2:47 history suggested Dinesh Kumar Garg
A tag has been added
Dec 13, 2015 at 2:16 comment added londonderry The same question for "an 11 am-to-7 pm shift". I think that the periods in "am"/"pm" can be left out. However, the hyphens should remain, because it's a phrasal adjective. Do you agree?
Dec 13, 2015 at 2:16 comment added londonderry Is the omission of the period out-and-out wrong? That's all I want to know. If you had your druthers, would you include or omit the full stop in these examples?
Dec 13, 2015 at 2:12 comment added Hot Licks It is up to publication policy as to whether periods appear after common abbreviations such as vs and etc.
Dec 13, 2015 at 2:07 review Suggested edits
S Dec 13, 2015 at 2:47
Dec 13, 2015 at 2:00 review First posts
Dec 13, 2015 at 2:07
Dec 13, 2015 at 1:58 history asked londonderry CC BY-SA 3.0