Skip to main content

Timeline for Exception to the word order S-V-O

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 12, 2021 at 16:15 comment added Edwin Ashworth There are no objects here, but complements. The usual order S - Vcop - Comp is inverted in these examples to Comp - Vcop - S. Subject-complement inversion.
Dec 6, 2015 at 23:52 comment added Araucaria - Him @ColinFine Sorry, what I meant is that we wouldn't consider it fronting but inversion.
S Dec 6, 2015 at 23:05 history suggested macraf CC BY-SA 3.0
improved formatting
Dec 6, 2015 at 22:29 review Suggested edits
S Dec 6, 2015 at 23:05
Dec 6, 2015 at 19:03 review Close votes
Dec 7, 2015 at 22:08
Dec 6, 2015 at 18:45 answer added Araucaria - Him timeline score: 4
Dec 6, 2015 at 18:01 comment added Colin Fine @Auracaria: no it wouldn't. I said the subject moves to affter the verb.
Dec 6, 2015 at 18:01 history edited Araucaria - Him CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Dec 6, 2015 at 17:55 comment added Anonym This is a vestige of V2 (verb-second) order; both English and German come from a common ancestor which used it.
Dec 6, 2015 at 17:38 comment added Araucaria - Him @ColinFine Not really, that would give you: "Behind him Sam was" and so forth. This is subject-dependent inversion. Notice how the Subject has moved to the end of the sentence.
Dec 6, 2015 at 16:55 comment added Pablo Marambio What is the question?
Dec 6, 2015 at 16:50 answer added John Lawler timeline score: 18
Dec 6, 2015 at 16:22 comment added Colin Fine These are fully grammatical examples of fronting. When an argument other than the subject is fronted (for emphasis, usually), it takes the place of the subject, which occurs after the verb.
Dec 6, 2015 at 16:21 review First posts
Dec 6, 2015 at 17:00
Dec 6, 2015 at 16:19 history asked user150383 CC BY-SA 3.0