Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

Regarding the triceps: It seems to be perfectly acceptable to use an apostrophe to denote plural in such cases. Personally, I would also argue it often helps eliminate confusion.

Consider:

bi: a bisexual person

 

plural: bis or bi's

(AHD)

Or:

a: the first letter of the English alphabet

 

plural: a's or as

(Webster's Unabridged)

In go get 'em the 'em part is a contraction, so it uses an apostrophe to indicate omission. Contraction is defined by Webster's Unabridged like so:

a shortening of a word, syllable, or word group by omission of one or more sounds or letters or by the reduction of two or more vowels or syllables to one — used especially of shortening in the interior of a word (as e'er for ever) and of shortening of enclitics (as 'll for will in they'll) and proclitics (as 't for it in 't is).

Regarding the triceps: It seems to be perfectly acceptable to use an apostrophe to denote plural in such cases. Personally, I would also argue it often helps eliminate confusion.

Consider:

bi: a bisexual person

 

plural: bis or bi's

(AHD)

Or:

a: the first letter of the English alphabet

 

plural: a's or as

(Webster's Unabridged)

In go get 'em the 'em part is a contraction, so it uses an apostrophe to indicate omission. Contraction is defined by Webster's Unabridged like so:

a shortening of a word, syllable, or word group by omission of one or more sounds or letters or by the reduction of two or more vowels or syllables to one — used especially of shortening in the interior of a word (as e'er for ever) and of shortening of enclitics (as 'll for will in they'll) and proclitics (as 't for it in 't is).

Regarding the triceps: It seems to be perfectly acceptable to use an apostrophe to denote plural in such cases. Personally, I would also argue it often helps eliminate confusion.

Consider:

bi: a bisexual person

plural: bis or bi's

(AHD)

Or:

a: the first letter of the English alphabet

plural: a's or as

(Webster's Unabridged)

In go get 'em the 'em part is a contraction, so it uses an apostrophe to indicate omission. Contraction is defined by Webster's Unabridged like so:

a shortening of a word, syllable, or word group by omission of one or more sounds or letters or by the reduction of two or more vowels or syllables to one — used especially of shortening in the interior of a word (as e'er for ever) and of shortening of enclitics (as 'll for will in they'll) and proclitics (as 't for it in 't is).

deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
A.P.
  • 13.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 58

Regarding the triceps: It seems to be perfectly acceptable to use an apostrophe to denote plural in such cases. Personally, I would also argue it often helps eliminate confusion.

Consider:

bi: a bisexual person

plural: bis or bi's

(AHD)

Or:

a: the first letter of the English alphabet

plural: a's or as

(Webster's Unabridged)

In go get 'em the 'em part is a contraction, so it uses an apostrophe to indicate the omission. Contraction is defined by Webster's Unabridged like so:

a shortening of a word, syllable, or word group by omission of one or more sounds or letters or by the reduction of two or more vowels or syllables to one — used especially of shortening in the interior of a word (as e'er for everever) and of shortening of enclitics (as 'll'll for willwill in they'll) and proclitics (as 't for it in 't is).

Regarding the triceps: It seems to be perfectly acceptable to use an apostrophe to denote plural in such cases. Personally, I would also argue it often helps eliminate confusion.

Consider:

bi: a bisexual person

plural: bis or bi's

(AHD)

Or:

a: the first letter of the English alphabet

plural: a's or as

(Webster's Unabridged)

In go get 'em the 'em part is a contraction, so it uses an apostrophe to indicate the omission. Contraction is defined by Webster's Unabridged like so:

a shortening of a word, syllable, or word group by omission of one or more sounds or letters or by the reduction of two or more vowels or syllables to one — used especially of shortening in the interior of a word (as e'er for ever) and of shortening of enclitics (as 'll for will in they'll).

Regarding the triceps: It seems to be perfectly acceptable to use an apostrophe to denote plural in such cases. Personally, I would also argue it often helps eliminate confusion.

Consider:

bi: a bisexual person

plural: bis or bi's

(AHD)

Or:

a: the first letter of the English alphabet

plural: a's or as

(Webster's Unabridged)

In go get 'em the 'em part is a contraction, so it uses an apostrophe to indicate omission. Contraction is defined by Webster's Unabridged like so:

a shortening of a word, syllable, or word group by omission of one or more sounds or letters or by the reduction of two or more vowels or syllables to one — used especially of shortening in the interior of a word (as e'er for ever) and of shortening of enclitics (as 'll for will in they'll) and proclitics (as 't for it in 't is).

added 82 characters in body
Source Link
A.P.
  • 13.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 58

Regarding the triceps: It seems to be perfectly acceptable to use an apostrophe to denote plural in such cases. Personally, I would also argue it often helps eliminate confusion.

Consider:

bi: a bisexual person

plural: bis or bi's

(AHD)

Or:

a: the first letter of the English alphabet

plural: a's or as

(Webster's Unabridged)

In go get 'em the 'em part is a contraction, so it uses an apostrophe to indicate the omission. Contraction is defined by Webster's Unabridged like so:

a shortening of a word, syllable, or word group by omission of one or more sounds or letters or by the reduction of two or more vowels or syllables to one — used especially of shortening in the interior of a word (as e'er for ever) and of shortening of enclitics (as 'll for will in they'll).

Regarding the triceps: It seems to be perfectly acceptable to use an apostrophe to denote plural in such cases.

Consider:

bi: a bisexual person

plural: bis or bi's

(AHD)

Or:

a: the first letter of the English alphabet

plural: a's or as

(Webster's Unabridged)

Regarding the triceps: It seems to be perfectly acceptable to use an apostrophe to denote plural in such cases. Personally, I would also argue it often helps eliminate confusion.

Consider:

bi: a bisexual person

plural: bis or bi's

(AHD)

Or:

a: the first letter of the English alphabet

plural: a's or as

(Webster's Unabridged)

In go get 'em the 'em part is a contraction, so it uses an apostrophe to indicate the omission. Contraction is defined by Webster's Unabridged like so:

a shortening of a word, syllable, or word group by omission of one or more sounds or letters or by the reduction of two or more vowels or syllables to one — used especially of shortening in the interior of a word (as e'er for ever) and of shortening of enclitics (as 'll for will in they'll).

Source Link
A.P.
  • 13.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 58
Loading