Timeline for Would the shortening of a word constitute the use of an apostrophe?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015 at 9:15 | vote | accept | VenomRush | ||
| Oct 16, 2015 at 8:17 | comment | added | VenomRush | Triceps is probably not the best example, the majority of muscle names are long and tedious to write out in full when both parties know what's being referred to with the shortened reference. Let's take gluteus maximus for example...it's normally referred to as glute's. | |
| Oct 16, 2015 at 8:12 | answer | added | Academiphile | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 16, 2015 at 8:11 | comment | added | Jeffrey Kemp |
I think tris would be confusing. However, if it's in written form why wouldn't you spell triceps out fully?
|
|
| Oct 16, 2015 at 8:05 | answer | added | A.P. | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 16, 2015 at 8:02 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 16, 2015 at 23:39 | |||||
| Oct 16, 2015 at 7:59 | history | asked | VenomRush | CC BY-SA 3.0 |