Timeline for Suggested alternatives for "nice-to-have" as a noun
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2015 at 21:40 | comment | added | Mitch | @TaW Sure, I see that. But they both work for the same category. Something that is desirable is not in the same category as 'should have'. You just want it rather than need it. | |
| Aug 19, 2015 at 15:59 | comment | added | TaW | I beg to disagree: 'desirable' is a strong, 'nice' a weak word. 'Nice-to-have' means basically 'non-essential' which doesn't go well with 'desirable', imo.. | |
| Aug 18, 2015 at 15:28 | history | edited | Mitch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added nouns
|
| Aug 18, 2015 at 15:22 | comment | added | Michael | "Desirable" is exactly the word I'd use to describe a "nice-to-have" feature. Good job on suggesting the emphasis. | |
| Aug 17, 2015 at 20:39 | history | edited | Mitch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 90 characters in body
|
| Aug 17, 2015 at 17:00 | history | edited | Mitch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Emphasis
|
| Aug 17, 2015 at 13:58 | comment | added | Dan Bron | +1 for desirable, suggest you bold or otherwise emphasize that specific word. | |
| Aug 17, 2015 at 13:53 | history | answered | Mitch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |