Timeline for "Describe with" vs. "describe by"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2011 at 22:30 | history | edited | RegDwigнt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
more descriptive title, tags
|
| May 27, 2011 at 21:57 | answer | added | Jay Elston | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 23, 2011 at 18:33 | vote | accept | stff00 | ||
| May 23, 2011 at 18:30 | comment | added | stff00 | @martin: I guess you make a valid point, there probably isn't a rule that's always valid, still, I thought there might be some more general guidelines about choosing between the two.. | |
| May 23, 2011 at 14:08 | answer | added | JSBձոգչ | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 23, 2011 at 13:57 | history | edited | JSBձոգչ |
edited tags
|
|
| May 23, 2011 at 13:54 | answer | added | Frantisek | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 23, 2011 at 13:27 | comment | added | martin jakubik | Your example is good, but I don't think it's really a question of "with" vs. "by". Some verbs only take "with", some only "by", and some take both but the meaning changes. I won't bet on this, but I would say it's a matter of remembering every pair. | |
| May 23, 2011 at 13:01 | history | asked | stff00 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |