Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 5, 2015 at 20:31 comment added John Lawler This is a spelling issue, of approximately the same importance for the future of mankind as the correct spelling of theatre or emphasize. In the real language there is no difference between could've and could of and could have; they're all pronounced the same and understood the same. It's only folks whose sensitivities to spelling were permanently overstimulated in grade school who worry about this. To an English learner, it's irrelevant because it doesn't affect speech.
Aug 5, 2015 at 17:03 history closed tchrist
FumbleFingers
Hellion
choster
Janus Bahs Jacquet
Duplicate of Is "of" instead of "have" correct?
Aug 5, 2015 at 17:03 comment added Masked Man "could of" is usually used by uneducated American teenagers.
Aug 5, 2015 at 16:53 answer added Woodrow Barlow timeline score: 4
Aug 5, 2015 at 15:39 comment added michael_timofeev Lol...I can't bear to see some of the English used there.
Aug 5, 2015 at 15:37 comment added Hellion (man, was that painful to write.)
Aug 5, 2015 at 15:37 comment added Hellion @michael_timofeev u could of seen it alot by now if u r on Facebook n read the comments their.
Aug 5, 2015 at 15:34 history edited Hellion CC BY-SA 3.0
fix title quotes; duplicate title question in body; remove "please help"; italics.
Aug 5, 2015 at 15:28 comment added michael_timofeev I hope could of never gets a foothold in English...not even informal...has it already?
Aug 5, 2015 at 13:16 review Close votes
Aug 5, 2015 at 17:09
Aug 5, 2015 at 12:54 comment added Margana "Could of" is a misrepresentation of "could've", which is a contraction of "could have", which is where you started. "Could of" is not yet acceptable (and drives some people mad when they see it).
Aug 5, 2015 at 12:52 answer added Hellion timeline score: 22
Aug 5, 2015 at 12:51 review First posts
Aug 5, 2015 at 13:11
Aug 5, 2015 at 12:47 history asked Sahil Yadav CC BY-SA 3.0